Carlos Taberner vs Max Alcala Gurri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the past 6 months, Gurri has won 42.15% of second serve points, compared to Taberner's 43.39%. Could this slight edge indicate a potential advantage for Taberner?
• Gurri has impressively secured 51.63% of points from their opponent's second serves, while Taberner has a figure of 48.02%. Will Gurri's return game be the key to success?
• When facing first serves, Gurri has captured 35.79% of points, outshining Taberner's 30.47%. Is this a sign that Gurri might handle high-pressure moments better?
• Taberner leads in saving breakpoints, fending off 53.33%, whereas Gurri has managed 49.4%. Could this indicate Taberner's potential upper hand in crucial situations?
• Both players have an identical match win rate of 65% over the past year, suggesting a close contest.
• Gurri's strongest surface is clay with a winning percentage of 62%, while Taberner excels on the same surface with 65%. Which player will leverage the familiar clay courts better?
• Gurri usually competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, boasting a 70.21% win rate, while Taberner often plays at the Challenger level, achieving a 66.67% win rate.
• Facing opponents, Gurri's average competitor ranked 439.96, whereas Taberner's opponents had an average rank of 238.05. Could Taberner's experience with tougher opponents benefit him?
• In deciding sets, Gurri wins 62% of the time, trumped by Taberner's 70% success rate. Does Taberner perform better in high-stakes moments?
• Gurri has a higher breakpoint conversion rate recently at 40.37%, compared to Taberner's 36.3%. Might this give Gurri an offensive edge?

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match approaches, the statistics paint a picture of two closely matched competitors, each with their unique strengths.

Taberner shows a marginal advantage in second serve performance, and his experience against higher-ranked opponents might prove beneficial. Meanwhile, Gurri's higher breakpoint conversion rate and strong return game could turn the match in his favor.

While both players shine on clay, Taberner's prowess on this surface is slightly superior. Furthermore, his ability to save breakpoints and win deciding sets suggests resilience in pressure situations.

Although Gurri has shown impressive form, the statistics suggest that Taberner may have the edge. Therefore, considering all factors, Taberner is poised as the likely victor in this match.